NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment
NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment COMMON HEALTH CONDITIONS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment plans. For […]
To start, you canNRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment
COMMON HEALTH CONDITIONS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN
Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment plans.
For this Case Study Assignment, you will chose from four case studies to identify common health implications for women. You will then explore the chosen case study to determine the diagnosis, diagnostic tests, and treatment options for the patient.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
- By Day 1 of this week, you will chose one of the four scenarios for this assignment.
- Review the Learning Resources for this week.
- Use the Assignment Template found in the Learning Resources to complete your assignment.
BY DAY 5 OF WEEK 8
Submit your case study assignment by Day 5 of Week 8.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as Wk8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies. | 30 to >26.7 ptsExcellentThe response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.26.7 to >23.7 ptsGoodThe response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.23.7 to >20.7 ptsFairThe response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.20.7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied. | 30 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies. | 30 to >26.76 ptsExcellentThe response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.26.76 to >23.7 ptsGoodThe response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.23.7 to >20.7 ptsFairThe response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case.20.7 to >0 ptsPoorThe response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case. | 30 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan. | 30 to >26.76 ptsExcellentFormulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.26.76 to >23.7 ptsGoodFormulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.23.7 to >20.7 ptsFairFormulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.20.7 to >0 ptsPoorFormulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines. | 30 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | 5 to >4.45 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4.45 to >3.95 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.95 to >3.45 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3.45 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts | |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 to >4.45 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors.4.45 to >3.95 ptsGoodContains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3.95 to >3.45 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.3.45 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts | |
| Total Points: 100 | |||
Get Answer
Calculate the price of your order
Select your paper details and see how much our professional writing services will cost.
- Freebies
- Format
- Formatting (MLA, APA, Chicago, custom, etc.)
- Title page & bibliography
- 24/7 customer support
- Amendments to your paper when they are needed
- Chat with your writer
- 275 word/double-spaced page
- 12 point Arial/Times New Roman
- Double, single, and custom spacing
-
We care about originality
Our custom human-written papers from top essay writers are always free from plagiarism.
-
We protect your privacy
Your data and payment info stay secured every time you get our help from an essay writer.
-
You control your money
Your money is safe with us. If your plans change, you can get it sent back to your card.
How it works
-
1
You give us the detailsComplete a brief order form to tell us what kind of paper you need.
-
2
We find you a top writerOne of the best experts in your discipline starts working on your essay.
-
3
You get the paper doneEnjoy writing that meets your demands and high academic standards!
Get your own paper from top experts
Order nowPerks of our essay writing service
We offer more than just hand-crafted papers customized for you. Here are more of our greatest perks.